DEPLOYDatabase

Waymo vs Tesla Robotaxi: A Verified Comparison (2026)

On every verified operational measure today, Waymo leads Tesla: it runs in more metros, keeps far more vehicles in active service, and reports many more paid rides each week. The two are the most-watched robotaxi programs in the United States, pursuing the same goal along very different paths. This is a side-by-side of what each has verifiably deployed, drawn from the DEPLOY registry, with company claims labeled as claims.

The short version: the two are at very different stages. Waymo operates a paid, fully-driverless service across roughly 11 US metros and reports about 500,000 rides per week. Tesla’s robotaxi service launched in Austin in July 2025 and operates in a smaller set of markets; its verified active fleet is currently small and has declined in recent months, even as the company has announced plans to expand to several more cities. The two companies also differ in approach in ways the raw numbers do not capture, and those differences are the real story.

Where Tesla’s approach is distinct. Tesla runs some Austin vehicles unsupervised (no in-car safety monitor), a milestone Waymo reached years earlier but which remains rare. Tesla’s thesis rests on its camera-only Full Self-Driving stack and its ability to manufacture vehicles at scale and low cost, which, if its autonomy reaches the necessary safety threshold, could allow rapid fleet expansion. Tesla’s current fleet is small partly by choice: the company has said it is gating expansion on safety validation rather than racing to scale.

Where Waymo is ahead today. On verified, operational measures, Waymo leads by a wide margin: more cities, vastly more vehicles in active service, far more paid rides, and a longer safety record (the company reports 127 million-plus autonomous miles). Waymo’s vehicles are purpose-equipped with lidar and a fuller sensor suite, a more expensive per-vehicle approach that has so far produced the more mature service.

What to watch. Tesla’s expansion claims versus its verified active fleet; whether its unsupervised crash rate improves; and whether Waymo’s higher per-vehicle cost or Tesla’s manufacturing scale proves the more durable model. The comparison below tracks the verified state and will update as the registry does.

Figures are drawn from the DEPLOY registry. Operational and financial figures stated by the companies are labeled as company-stated. Active-fleet counts are attributed to their tracking sources. See how we verify.

Side-by-side comparison of Waymo and Tesla robotaxi programs
AttributeWaymoRobotaxiTeslaRobotaxi
Operating marketsDEPLOY VERIFIED
~11 US metros
DEPLOY VERIFIED
Austin, Bay Area, Dallas, Houston
Active fleetCompany-claimed
Scaling
company-reported
Company-claimed
~34 active, down from ~165
per Robotaxi Tracker
Weekly ridesCompany-claimed
~500,000
company-stated
Company-claimed
Not disclosed
SupervisionDEPLOY VERIFIED
Fully driverless
DEPLOY VERIFIED
Mixed: some unsupervised (Austin), some supervised
VehicleDEPLOY VERIFIED
Jaguar I-PACE, lidar + sensor suite
DEPLOY VERIFIED
Model Y, camera-only FSD
ValuationCompany-claimed
$126B (Feb 2026)
company-stated
DEPLOY VERIFIED
Public (TSLA)
Autonomous milesCompany-claimed
127M+
company-stated
Company-claimed
NHTSA crash record (17 incidents)
per NHTSA filings
Incidents (registry)DEPLOY VERIFIED
1206
DEPLOY VERIFIED
97
StatusDEPLOY VERIFIED
Active, expanding
DEPLOY VERIFIED
Active, fleet contracting

Safety: what is verified, and what is not

Under NHTSA’s Standing General Order, operators must report crashes involving their automated-driving systems. Through May 2026 the public SGO data records about 697 reported crashes for Waymo, 41 for Avride, 32 for Zoox, and 18 for Tesla. These are counts of reported crashes, not fault determinations, and NHTSA does not normalize them for miles driven, so they cannot be read as a safety ranking. A higher count generally reflects a larger fleet and far more miles on the road, not a less safe operator: Waymo’s total is the highest primarily because it operates by far the most vehicles and the most paid rides.

Waymo publishes its own safety figures: across more than 127 million rider-only miles it reports roughly 55 percent fewer injury-causing crashes than the human benchmark for the same roads (about 2.1 versus 4.68 injury crashes per million miles) and roughly 90 percent fewer crashes involving a serious injury, or about one crash per 2.7 million miles. These are Waymo’s own published figures, validated in part by the reinsurer Swiss Re, and are not independently audited by a regulator.

For Tesla, no clean, independently audited per-mile figure exists. Its Bay Area robotaxi service operates under a chauffeur-service permit rather than an autonomous-vehicle testing permit, so it does not appear in California DMV autonomous-mileage data, and no audited Austin mileage has been published. Because of that, Tesla’s reported crashes cannot be turned into a per-mile rate comparable to Waymo’s, and DEPLOY does not publish one. Where a directly comparable, verified number does not exist, we say so rather than estimate it.

See the full cross-operator safety record on each operator’s page: Waymo safety record and Tesla safety record.

See also: where you can ride a robotaxi, what happened to Cruise, all verified robotaxis, all verified deployments, humanoid companies·Accountability: incidents.

Featured deployments

Deploy Watch

Track Waymo and Tesla on Deploy.

Notified when either's verified state changes, not when their makers issue claims.

Free to use on your site, with a link back to DEPLOY.