DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Biren BR100

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldAMD Instinct MI250XBiren BR100
Process nodeTSMC N6TSMC N7
Transistors (B)77
TDP560 W550 W
Memory128 GB HBM2e64 GB HBM2e
Memory bandwidth3,200 GB/s2,300 GB/s
FP16 (dense)383 TFLOPS1,024 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)383 TFLOPS1,024 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)383 TOPS2,048 TOPS
Form factorOAMOAM
Announced2021-11-082022-08-09
Released2022-06-01

Robots running AMD Instinct MI250X

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Biren BR100

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with AMD Instinct MI250X

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Biren BR100

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Biren BR100: which is faster for training?

Biren BR100 has 2.67x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (AMD Instinct MI250X: 383 TFLOPS; Biren BR100: 1,024 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Biren BR100: which has more memory?

AMD Instinct MI250X carries more HBM (AMD Instinct MI250X: 128 GB HBM2e; Biren BR100: 64 GB HBM2e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Biren BR100: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: AMD Instinct MI250X 0.68 (383 ÷ 560 W); Biren BR100 1.86 (1,024 ÷ 550 W). Biren BR100 wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI250X full page · Biren BR100 full page.