DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

AMD Instinct MI300X vs Biren BR100

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldAMD Instinct MI300XBiren BR100
Process nodeTSMC N5 + N6 (chiplet)TSMC N7
Transistors (B)15377
TDP750 W550 W
Memory192 GB HBM364 GB HBM2e
Memory bandwidth5,300 GB/s2,300 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,307 TFLOPS1,024 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,307 TFLOPS1,024 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)2,614 TFLOPS—
INT8 (dense)2,614 TOPS2,048 TOPS
Launch price (list)$15,000—
Form factorOAMOAM
Announced2023-12-062022-08-09
Released2024-01-01—

Robots running AMD Instinct MI300X

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Biren BR100

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with AMD Instinct MI300X

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Biren BR100

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

AMD Instinct MI300X vs Biren BR100: which is faster for training?

AMD Instinct MI300X has 2.55x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (AMD Instinct MI300X: 2,614 TFLOPS; Biren BR100: 1,024 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

AMD Instinct MI300X vs Biren BR100: which has more memory?

AMD Instinct MI300X carries more HBM (AMD Instinct MI300X: 192 GB HBM3; Biren BR100: 64 GB HBM2e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

AMD Instinct MI300X vs Biren BR100: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: AMD Instinct MI300X 3.49 (2,614 ÷ 750 W); Biren BR100 1.86 (1,024 ÷ 550 W). AMD Instinct MI300X wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI300X full page · Biren BR100 full page.