Chip comparison
AMD Instinct MI300X vs Mobileye EyeQ6
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | AMD Instinct MI300X | Mobileye EyeQ6 |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 + N6 (chiplet) | TSMC 7nm |
| Transistors (B) | 153 | — |
| TDP | 750 W | 33 W |
| Memory | 192 GB HBM3 | — |
| Memory bandwidth | 5,300 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 1,307 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 1,307 TFLOPS | — |
| FP8 (dense) | 2,614 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 2,614 TOPS | 34 TOPS |
| Launch price (list) | $15,000 | — |
| Form factor | OAM | Auto-safety SoC |
| Announced | 2023-12-06 | 2022-01-04 |
| Released | 2024-01-01 | 2024-01-01 |
Robots running AMD Instinct MI300X
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Data centers with AMD Instinct MI300X
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
AMD Instinct MI300X vs Mobileye EyeQ6: which is more widely used?
AMD Instinct MI300X: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI300X full page · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page.