Chip comparison
AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Mobileye EyeQ6
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | AMD Instinct MI350 series | Mobileye EyeQ6 |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N3 (chiplet) | TSMC 7nm |
| TDP | 1000 W | 33 W |
| Memory | 288 GB HBM3e | — |
| Memory bandwidth | 8,000 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 2,300 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 2,300 TFLOPS | — |
| FP8 (dense) | 4,600 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 4,600 TOPS | 34 TOPS |
| Form factor | OAM | Auto-safety SoC |
| Announced | 2025-06-12 | 2022-01-04 |
| Released | 2025-10-01 | 2024-01-01 |
Robots running AMD Instinct MI350 series
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Data centers with AMD Instinct MI350 series
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Mobileye EyeQ6: which is more widely used?
AMD Instinct MI350 series: 0 robots and 1 data center publicly running it. Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI350 series full page · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page.