DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Tesla Dojo D1

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldAMD Instinct MI350 seriesTesla Dojo D1
Process nodeTSMC N3 (chiplet)TSMC N7
Transistors (B)50
Die size645 mm²
TDP1000 W400 W
Memory288 GB HBM3e
Memory bandwidth8,000 GB/s
FP16 (dense)2,300 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)2,300 TFLOPS362 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)4,600 TFLOPS362 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)4,600 TOPS
Form factorOAMTraining tile (25 D1 chips per tile)
Announced2025-06-122021-08-19
Released2025-10-012023-07-01

Robots running AMD Instinct MI350 series

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Tesla Dojo D1

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with AMD Instinct MI350 series

Data centers with Tesla Dojo D1

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Tesla Dojo D1: which is faster for training?

AMD Instinct MI350 series has 12.71x the dense FP8 throughput of the other (AMD Instinct MI350 series: 4,600 TFLOPS; Tesla Dojo D1: 362 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Tesla Dojo D1: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP8 TFLOPS per watt: AMD Instinct MI350 series 4.60 (4,600 ÷ 1000 W); Tesla Dojo D1 0.91 (362 ÷ 400 W). AMD Instinct MI350 series wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Tesla Dojo D1: which is more widely used?

AMD Instinct MI350 series: 0 robots and 1 data center publicly running it. Tesla Dojo D1: 0 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.

See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI350 series full page · Tesla Dojo D1 full page.