DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

AWS Inferentia 2 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldAWS Inferentia 2NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor
Process nodeTSMC N7TSMC 4NP
TDP250 W130 W
Memory32 GB HBM3128 GB LPDDR5X
Memory bandwidth820 GB/s273 GB/s
BF16 (dense)190 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)380 TFLOPS2,070 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)2,070 TOPS
Form factorInf2 EC2 instanceModule (AGX Thor)
Announced2022-12-012024-03-18
Released2023-04-012025-08-01

Robots running AWS Inferentia 2

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor

Data centers with AWS Inferentia 2

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

AWS Inferentia 2 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which is faster for training?

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor has 5.45x the dense FP8 throughput of the other (AWS Inferentia 2: 380 TFLOPS; NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: 2,070 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

AWS Inferentia 2 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which has more memory?

NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor carries more HBM (AWS Inferentia 2: 32 GB HBM3; NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: 128 GB LPDDR5X). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

AWS Inferentia 2 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP8 TFLOPS per watt: AWS Inferentia 2 1.52 (380 ÷ 250 W); NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor 15.92 (2,070 ÷ 130 W). NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

AWS Inferentia 2 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which is more widely used?

AWS Inferentia 2: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: 11 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.

See also: every chip comparison · AWS Inferentia 2 full page · NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor full page.