Chip comparison
Biren BR100 vs Mobileye EyeQ6
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Biren BR100 | Mobileye EyeQ6 |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N7 | TSMC 7nm |
| Transistors (B) | 77 | — |
| TDP | 550 W | 33 W |
| Memory | 64 GB HBM2e | — |
| Memory bandwidth | 2,300 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 1,024 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 1,024 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 2,048 TOPS | 34 TOPS |
| Form factor | OAM | Auto-safety SoC |
| Announced | 2022-08-09 | 2022-01-04 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-01 |
Robots running Biren BR100
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Data centers with Biren BR100
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Biren BR100 vs Mobileye EyeQ6: which is more widely used?
Biren BR100: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Biren BR100 full page · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page.