DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Biren BR100 vs NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell)

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldBiren BR100NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell)
Process nodeTSMC N7TSMC 4NP
Transistors (B)77
TDP550 W700 W
Memory64 GB HBM2e192 GB HBM3e
Memory bandwidth2,300 GB/s8,000 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,024 TFLOPS1,750 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,024 TFLOPS1,750 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)3,500 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)2,048 TOPS
Form factorOAMSXM6 (700 W envelope)
Announced2022-08-092024-03-18
Released2024-11-01

Robots running Biren BR100

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell)

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Biren BR100

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell)

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Biren BR100 vs NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell): which is faster for training?

NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell) has 3.42x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Biren BR100: 1,024 TFLOPS; NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell): 3,500 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Biren BR100 vs NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell): which has more memory?

NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell) carries more HBM (Biren BR100: 64 GB HBM2e; NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell): 192 GB HBM3e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Biren BR100 vs NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell): which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Biren BR100 1.86 (1,024 ÷ 550 W); NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell) 5.00 (3,500 ÷ 700 W). NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell) wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Biren BR100 full page · NVIDIA B100 (Blackwell) full page.