Chip comparison
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs Mobileye EyeQ6
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Cambricon MLU370-X8 | Mobileye EyeQ6 |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N7 | TSMC 7nm |
| TDP | 250 W | 33 W |
| Memory | 48 GB LPDDR5 | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 96 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 256 TOPS | 34 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe | Auto-safety SoC |
| Announced | 2022-03-25 | 2022-01-04 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-01 |
Robots running Cambricon MLU370-X8
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Data centers with Cambricon MLU370-X8
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs Mobileye EyeQ6: which is more widely used?
Cambricon MLU370-X8: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Cambricon MLU370-X8 full page · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page.