Chip comparison
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Cambricon MLU370-X8 | NVIDIA L40S |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N7 | TSMC 4N |
| Transistors (B) | — | 76.3 |
| TDP | 250 W | 350 W |
| Memory | 48 GB LPDDR5 | 48 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | — | 864 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | 96 TFLOPS | 362 TFLOPS |
| BF16 (dense) | — | 362 TFLOPS |
| FP8 (dense) | — | 733 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 256 TOPS | 733 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe | PCIe |
| Announced | 2022-03-25 | 2023-08-08 |
Robots running Cambricon MLU370-X8
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running NVIDIA L40S
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Cambricon MLU370-X8
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with NVIDIA L40S
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S: which is faster for training?
NVIDIA L40S has 7.64x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Cambricon MLU370-X8: 96 TFLOPS; NVIDIA L40S: 733 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S: which has more memory?
NVIDIA L40S carries more HBM (Cambricon MLU370-X8: 48 GB LPDDR5; NVIDIA L40S: 48 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S: which is more power-efficient?
Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Cambricon MLU370-X8 0.38 (96 ÷ 250 W); NVIDIA L40S 2.09 (733 ÷ 350 W). NVIDIA L40S wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.
See also: every chip comparison · Cambricon MLU370-X8 full page · NVIDIA L40S full page.