DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldCambricon MLU370-X8NVIDIA L40S
Process nodeTSMC N7TSMC 4N
Transistors (B)76.3
TDP250 W350 W
Memory48 GB LPDDR548 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth864 GB/s
FP16 (dense)96 TFLOPS362 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)362 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)733 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)256 TOPS733 TOPS
Form factorPCIePCIe
Announced2022-03-252023-08-08

Robots running Cambricon MLU370-X8

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running NVIDIA L40S

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Cambricon MLU370-X8

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA L40S

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S: which is faster for training?

NVIDIA L40S has 7.64x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Cambricon MLU370-X8: 96 TFLOPS; NVIDIA L40S: 733 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S: which has more memory?

NVIDIA L40S carries more HBM (Cambricon MLU370-X8: 48 GB LPDDR5; NVIDIA L40S: 48 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Cambricon MLU370-X8 vs NVIDIA L40S: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Cambricon MLU370-X8 0.38 (96 ÷ 250 W); NVIDIA L40S 2.09 (733 ÷ 350 W). NVIDIA L40S wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Cambricon MLU370-X8 full page · NVIDIA L40S full page.