DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldGoogle TPU v7 (Ironwood)NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor
Process nodeTSMC 4NP
TDP700 W130 W
Memory192 GB HBM3e128 GB LPDDR5X
Memory bandwidth7,400 GB/s273 GB/s
BF16 (dense)4,614 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)9,228 TFLOPS2,070 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)2,070 TOPS
Form factorOAM (Ironwood pod, up to 9,216 chips)Module (AGX Thor)
Announced2025-04-092024-03-18
Released2025-12-012025-08-01

Robots running Google TPU v7 (Ironwood)

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor

Data centers with Google TPU v7 (Ironwood)

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which is faster for training?

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) has 4.46x the dense FP8 throughput of the other (Google TPU v7 (Ironwood): 9,228 TFLOPS; NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: 2,070 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which has more memory?

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) carries more HBM (Google TPU v7 (Ironwood): 192 GB HBM3e; NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: 128 GB LPDDR5X). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP8 TFLOPS per watt: Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) 13.18 (9,228 ÷ 700 W); NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor 15.92 (2,070 ÷ 130 W). NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: which is more widely used?

Google TPU v7 (Ironwood): 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor: 11 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.

See also: every chip comparison · Google TPU v7 (Ironwood) full page · NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor full page.