DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Huawei Ascend 910C vs Huawei Ascend 910D

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldHuawei Ascend 910CHuawei Ascend 910D
Process nodeSMIC N+2 (~7nm)SMIC N+2 (~7nm)
TDP500 W800 W
Memory128 GB HBM2e192 GB HBM3
Memory bandwidth3,200 GB/s4,000 GB/s
FP16 (dense)800 TFLOPS1,200 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)800 TFLOPS1,200 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)2,400 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)1,600 TOPS
Form factorOAMOAM
Announced2024-09-192025-04-01
Released2025-01-012025-12-01

Robots running Huawei Ascend 910C

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Huawei Ascend 910D

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Huawei Ascend 910C

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Huawei Ascend 910D

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Huawei Ascend 910C vs Huawei Ascend 910D: which is faster for training?

Huawei Ascend 910D has 3.00x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Huawei Ascend 910C: 800 TFLOPS; Huawei Ascend 910D: 2,400 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Huawei Ascend 910C vs Huawei Ascend 910D: which has more memory?

Huawei Ascend 910D carries more HBM (Huawei Ascend 910C: 128 GB HBM2e; Huawei Ascend 910D: 192 GB HBM3). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Huawei Ascend 910C vs Huawei Ascend 910D: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Huawei Ascend 910C 1.60 (800 ÷ 500 W); Huawei Ascend 910D 3.00 (2,400 ÷ 800 W). Huawei Ascend 910D wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Huawei Ascend 910C full page · Huawei Ascend 910D full page.