DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldIntel Gaudi 2NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU
Process nodeTSMC N7TSMC 12FFN
Transistors (B)13.6
Die size545 mm²
TDP600 W70 W
Memory96 GB HBM2e16 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth2,450 GB/s320 GB/s
FP16 (dense)65 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)432 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)130 TOPS
Form factorOAMPCIe (single-slot, low-profile)
Announced2022-05-102018-09-13
Released2022-09-012019-01-01

Robots running Intel Gaudi 2

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Intel Gaudi 2

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: which is faster for training?

Intel Gaudi 2 has 6.65x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Intel Gaudi 2: 432 TFLOPS; NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: 65 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: which has more memory?

Intel Gaudi 2 carries more HBM (Intel Gaudi 2: 96 GB HBM2e; NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Intel Gaudi 2 0.72 (432 ÷ 600 W); NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU 0.93 (65 ÷ 70 W). NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Intel Gaudi 2 full page · NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU full page.