Chip comparison
Intel Gaudi 2 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Intel Gaudi 2 | Tenstorrent Wormhole |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N7 | GlobalFoundries 12nm |
| TDP | 600 W | 160 W |
| Memory | 96 GB HBM2e | 12 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 2,450 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 148 TFLOPS |
| BF16 (dense) | 432 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | — | 590 TOPS |
| Form factor | OAM | PCIe (n300, n150) |
| Announced | 2022-05-10 | 2024-07-01 |
| Released | 2022-09-01 | 2024-08-01 |
Robots running Intel Gaudi 2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Tenstorrent Wormhole
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Intel Gaudi 2
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Tenstorrent Wormhole
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Intel Gaudi 2 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole: which is faster for training?
Intel Gaudi 2 has 2.92x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Intel Gaudi 2: 432 TFLOPS; Tenstorrent Wormhole: 148 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.
Intel Gaudi 2 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole: which has more memory?
Intel Gaudi 2 carries more HBM (Intel Gaudi 2: 96 GB HBM2e; Tenstorrent Wormhole: 12 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Intel Gaudi 2 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole: which is more power-efficient?
Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Intel Gaudi 2 0.72 (432 ÷ 600 W); Tenstorrent Wormhole 0.93 (148 ÷ 160 W). Tenstorrent Wormhole wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.
See also: every chip comparison · Intel Gaudi 2 full page · Tenstorrent Wormhole full page.