Chip comparison
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs NVIDIA L40S
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Mobileye EyeQ6 | NVIDIA L40S |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC 7nm | TSMC 4N |
| Transistors (B) | — | 76.3 |
| TDP | 33 W | 350 W |
| Memory | — | 48 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | — | 864 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 362 TFLOPS |
| BF16 (dense) | — | 362 TFLOPS |
| FP8 (dense) | — | 733 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 34 TOPS | 733 TOPS |
| Form factor | Auto-safety SoC | PCIe |
| Announced | 2022-01-04 | 2023-08-08 |
| Released | 2024-01-01 | — |
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Robots running NVIDIA L40S
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with NVIDIA L40S
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs NVIDIA L40S: which is more widely used?
Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers publicly running it. NVIDIA L40S: 0 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page · NVIDIA L40S full page.