Chip comparison
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Mobileye EyeQ6 | Tenstorrent Wormhole |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC 7nm | GlobalFoundries 12nm |
| TDP | 33 W | 160 W |
| Memory | — | 12 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | — | 288 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 148 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 34 TOPS | 590 TOPS |
| Form factor | Auto-safety SoC | PCIe (n300, n150) |
| Announced | 2022-01-04 | 2024-07-01 |
| Released | 2024-01-01 | 2024-08-01 |
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Robots running Tenstorrent Wormhole
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Tenstorrent Wormhole
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs Tenstorrent Wormhole: which is more widely used?
Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers publicly running it. Tenstorrent Wormhole: 0 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page · Tenstorrent Wormhole full page.