DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

NVIDIA L40S vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldNVIDIA L40SNVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU
Process nodeTSMC 4NTSMC 12FFN
Transistors (B)76.313.6
Die size545 mm²
TDP350 W70 W
Memory48 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth864 GB/s320 GB/s
FP16 (dense)362 TFLOPS65 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)362 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)733 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)733 TOPS130 TOPS
Form factorPCIePCIe (single-slot, low-profile)
Announced2023-08-082018-09-13
Released2019-01-01

Robots running NVIDIA L40S

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA L40S

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

NVIDIA L40S vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: which is faster for training?

NVIDIA L40S has 11.28x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (NVIDIA L40S: 733 TFLOPS; NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: 65 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

NVIDIA L40S vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: which has more memory?

NVIDIA L40S carries more HBM (NVIDIA L40S: 48 GB GDDR6; NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

NVIDIA L40S vs NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: NVIDIA L40S 2.09 (733 ÷ 350 W); NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU 0.93 (65 ÷ 70 W). NVIDIA L40S wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · NVIDIA L40S full page · NVIDIA T4 Tensor Core GPU full page.