Data center comparison
Austin vs Lancaster
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Austin | Lancaster | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | energized |
| Developer | CoreWeave | CoreWeave |
| Location | Austin, Texas, United States | Lancaster, Texas, United States |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Austin or Lancaster?
Austin is energized; Lancaster is energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Austin and Lancaster?
Austin is in Austin, Texas, United States; Lancaster is in Lancaster, Texas, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.