Data center comparison
Chester vs Kenilworth Expansion
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Chester | Kenilworth Expansion | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | announced |
| Developer | CoreWeave | CoreWeave |
| Location | Rochester, Minnesota, USA | Kenilworth, Union, New Jersey, United States |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Chester or Kenilworth Expansion?
Chester is energized; Kenilworth Expansion is announced. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Chester and Kenilworth Expansion?
Chester is in Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Kenilworth Expansion is in Kenilworth, Union, New Jersey, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.