Data center comparison
Lancaster vs Wyoming campus
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Lancaster | Wyoming campus | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | announced |
| Developer | CoreWeave | CoreWeave |
| Location | Lancaster, Texas, United States | Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Lancaster or Wyoming campus?
Lancaster is energized; Wyoming campus is announced. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Lancaster and Wyoming campus?
Lancaster is in Lancaster, Texas, United States; Wyoming campus is in Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.