Data center comparison
FluidStack Texas Anthropic campus vs Lake Mariner Data Campus
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| FluidStack Texas Anthropic campus | Lake Mariner Data Campus | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | 0.75 GW |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | 0.10 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | 0.65 GW |
| Lifecycle | announced | partially energized |
| Developer | Fluidstack | TeraWulf Inc. |
| Location | China (city unspecified) | Barker, New York, United States |
| Grid | not recorded | NYISO |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, FluidStack Texas Anthropic campus or Lake Mariner Data Campus?
FluidStack Texas Anthropic campus is announced; Lake Mariner Data Campus is partially energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus 0.10 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are FluidStack Texas Anthropic campus and Lake Mariner Data Campus?
FluidStack Texas Anthropic campus is in China (city unspecified); Lake Mariner Data Campus is in Barker, New York, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.