Data center comparison
GDS Beijing 3 vs GDS Shanghai 3
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| GDS Beijing 3 | GDS Shanghai 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | energized |
| Developer | GDS Holdings | GDS Holdings |
| Location | Beijing, China, China | Shanghai, China |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, GDS Beijing 3 or GDS Shanghai 3?
GDS Beijing 3 is energized; GDS Shanghai 3 is energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are GDS Beijing 3 and GDS Shanghai 3?
GDS Beijing 3 is in Beijing, China, China; GDS Shanghai 3 is in Shanghai, China. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.