Data center comparison
GDS Beijing 3 vs GDS Ulanqab Campus
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| GDS Beijing 3 | GDS Ulanqab Campus | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | under construction |
| Developer | GDS Holdings | GDS Holdings |
| Location | Beijing, China, China | Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, China |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, GDS Beijing 3 or GDS Ulanqab Campus?
GDS Beijing 3 is energized; GDS Ulanqab Campus is under construction. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are GDS Beijing 3 and GDS Ulanqab Campus?
GDS Beijing 3 is in Beijing, China, China; GDS Ulanqab Campus is in Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, China. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.