Data center comparison
IBM Quantum System One Kawasaki Japan vs IBM Quantum System One at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| IBM Quantum System One Kawasaki Japan | IBM Quantum System One at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | energized |
| Developer | IBM | IBM |
| Location | Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan | Troy, New York, USA |
| Grid | other | NYISO |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, IBM Quantum System One Kawasaki Japan or IBM Quantum System One at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute?
IBM Quantum System One Kawasaki Japan is energized; IBM Quantum System One at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are IBM Quantum System One Kawasaki Japan and IBM Quantum System One at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute?
IBM Quantum System One Kawasaki Japan is in Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan; IBM Quantum System One at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is in Troy, New York, USA. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.