Data center comparison
IQM Espoo Quantum Production Facility vs IQM US Quantum Technology Center Maryland
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| IQM Espoo Quantum Production Facility | IQM US Quantum Technology Center Maryland | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | energized |
| Developer | IQM Quantum Computers | IQM Quantum Computers |
| Location | Espoo, Finland, Finland (Eurosatory 2026 showcase), Europe | University of Maryland |
| Grid | other | PJM |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, IQM Espoo Quantum Production Facility or IQM US Quantum Technology Center Maryland?
IQM Espoo Quantum Production Facility is energized; IQM US Quantum Technology Center Maryland is energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are IQM Espoo Quantum Production Facility and IQM US Quantum Technology Center Maryland?
IQM Espoo Quantum Production Facility is in Espoo, Finland, Finland (Eurosatory 2026 showcase), Europe; IQM US Quantum Technology Center Maryland is in University of Maryland. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.