DEPLOYDatabase

Capabilities

Where are exoskeletons actually used?

Read live from the deployment record

In two worlds that barely overlap: logistics warehouses and rehabilitation clinics. The record splits cleanly by what each machine is for. Back-support exosuits are recorded in European logistics warehouses and factories, at Dachser, La Poste and an Ingolstadt car plant. Powered lower-limb exoskeletons are recorded in hospitals and rehabilitation clinics in the United States, Germany, France, Canada, Japan, Malaysia and Ukraine. The honest caveat sits alongside: most of the registry's exoskeleton models carry no recorded deployment at all, and a large share of the deployments that exist are sourced only to the maker's own website.

Last verified Aug 1, 202535 sources

Find out instantly when it changes.

Verified changes only. We check the record and link every source. No marketing.

In two settings that have almost nothing to do with each other.

Industrial and logistics. Back-support exosuits are recorded in European warehouses and plants: German Bionic's Cray X at Dachser in Magdeburg and at La Poste sites in Duisburg, Malsch and Leupoldsgrun, its Apogee exosuit in Augsburg, and Noonee's Chairless Chair at Ingolstadt. These are lifting and standing aids for people already doing the job, not machines replacing them.

Medical and rehabilitation. Powered lower-limb exoskeletons are recorded in clinical settings: Ekso Bionics' EksoNR and Indego in the United States and Germany, Lifeward's ReWalk in the United States, Wandercraft's self-balancing Atalante X in Paris, B-TEMIA's Keeogo in Montreal, Ottobock's Phoenix in Duderstadt, Hocoma's Lokomat, and Cyberdyne's bioelectrically-controlled HAL in Japan, Malaysia and Ukraine.

Now the part a vendor round-up leaves out. Most of the exoskeleton models on the registry have no reviewed deployment at all: they are recorded machines with no recorded use. Of the deployments that do exist, a large share rest entirely on the manufacturer's own website, and more than half carry no start date on the record. All three of those numbers are on this page, because a page about where a technology is used is only as good as its willingness to say where the evidence runs out.

One thing this page does not tell you: whether exoskeletons work. The registry holds deployments, not clinical outcomes or productivity results. A deployment is evidence that a machine is in use somewhere. It is not evidence that it helped.

What the record holds

Counted from the registry rather than asserted. The first number is the one a vendor round-up never shows.

Models with recorded use
13 of 28
Places
18
Maker's word alone
9 of 22

22 reviewed deployment records across 13 machines and 10 makers, at 18 distinct places. 15 of the 28 reviewed exoskeleton models carry no deployment record at all. Of the records that exist, 9 rest entirely on the maker’s own domain and 12 carry no start date, so they show as not yet on record rather than being given an invented one. Only 10 are dated.

Three different claims, kept apart

Each column is attributed to what it actually describes. The third is the claim DEPLOY refuses to make.

What the record shows

Named machines at named sites

Every row is a reviewed deployment at a specific place: a logistics warehouse, a car plant, a hospital, a rehabilitation clinic. Each carries the registry's own status and its own sources, read live at page load.

What the record does not show

Whether any of it worked

The registry holds deployments, not clinical outcomes, injury rates or productivity results. A deployment is evidence that a machine is in use at a named place and nothing further. Several of these devices carry regulatory clearances, which are their own kind of evidence, but a clearance is not an efficacy finding either.

What DEPLOY will not claim

That the rest are independently sourced

An entry is flagged when every source behind it sits on the maker's own domain, tested against both the company name and the model name. The remainder are described only as not the maker's own domain: a press-release wire or an investor-relations site is neither the manufacturer nor a disinterested party.

Where they are recorded in use

Most deployed first. Each machine is described in its own model record’s words, which is what makes the split between industrial back-support exosuits and clinical lower-limb exoskeletons visible without DEPLOY imposing a taxonomy on it.

Exoskeleton deployments on the DEPLOY record

Recorded machines with no recorded use

15 of the 28 reviewed exoskeleton models on the registry carry no deployment record. That is an absence in DEPLOY’s record, not a finding that these machines have never been used: it means no reviewed deployment has been recorded for them yet. Naming them is more useful than leaving them out.

Reviewed exoskeleton models with no reviewed deployment on the record
MachineMaker
ARKEBionik Laboratories
ATOUN MODEL YATOUN
Fourier ExoMotus M4Fourier Intelligence
Guardian XOSarcos Robotics
HANKGOGOA Mobility Robots
Honda Walking Assist DeviceHonda
IndegoParker Hannifin Indego
LaevoLaevo
Lockheed Martin ONYXLockheed Martin
MAX Industrial ExoskeletonSuitX (US Bionics)
Muscle Suit EveryInnophys
Myomo MyoProMyomo
Rex Bionics REXRex Bionics
Roam Robotics AscendRoam Robotics
Verve Motion SafeLiftVerve Motion
How we know this

Every machine on this page is a deployment record on the DEPLOY registry, read live at page load, with its own place, its own dated start where the record holds one, and its own sources. Each machine is described in its own model record's words rather than characterised here. Here are the sources behind them.

Sourcing is tested against each maker's company name and its model name, so an entry resting entirely on the manufacturer's own domain is visible as one. The models with no reviewed deployment are named on the page rather than omitted: absence from the record means DEPLOY holds no deployment for that machine, which is not a finding that it has never been used.

Common questions

Are exoskeletons used in factories and warehouses?
Yes, on the record, and mostly in Europe. German Bionic's Cray X back-support exosuit is recorded at a Dachser logistics site in Magdeburg and at La Poste sites in Duisburg, Malsch and Leupoldsgrun; its Apogee exosuit is recorded in Augsburg; and Noonee's Chairless Chair, a wearable device that stiffens into a seat when the wearer squats, is recorded at Ingolstadt. These are lifting and posture aids for workers rather than autonomous machines.
Are exoskeletons used in hospitals?
Yes. The record holds powered lower-limb exoskeletons in clinical and rehabilitation use: Ekso Bionics' EksoNR and Ekso Indego, Lifeward's ReWalk 7 and Personal 6.0, Wandercraft's hands-free self-balancing Atalante X in Paris, B-TEMIA's Keeogo in Montreal, Ottobock's Phoenix, Hocoma's Lokomat gait trainer, and Cyberdyne's HAL, which is controlled by bioelectric signals read at the skin surface.
Do exoskeletons actually work?
DEPLOY cannot answer that from this record and does not try. The registry holds deployments, which are evidence that a machine is in use at a named place, not clinical outcomes, injury-rate data or productivity results. Several of these devices carry regulatory clearances that are their own kind of evidence, but a clearance is not an efficacy finding either. Where you need outcomes, follow each row's own sources.
How many exoskeletons are actually deployed?
The page reports how many reviewed deployment records the registry holds and at how many distinct places, which is a floor rather than a market figure. It also reports the number of reviewed exoskeleton models that carry no deployment record at all, which is the larger share. A model existing on the registry is not evidence that anyone is using it.
Is this just marketing from the exoskeleton makers?
A meaningful part of it is the maker's own account, and the page says exactly how much. Each entry is tested against both the company name and the model name from the record, and flagged when every source behind it sits on the manufacturer's own domain. DEPLOY does not describe the remainder as independent, only as not the maker's own domain, because a press-release wire or an investor-relations site is neither the manufacturer nor a disinterested party.
Which countries use exoskeletons?
On the record: Germany, the United States, France, Canada, Japan, Malaysia and Ukraine, alongside rows recorded at global rather than national scope. That is what the registry documents rather than a complete survey; a country absent from this page is one DEPLOY holds no reviewed exoskeleton deployment for, not one where exoskeletons are unused.

Keep reading

Ask the registry

Track this answer

Find out instantly when it changes.

Verified changes only. We check the record and link every source. No marketing.

Canonical URL: /where-are-exoskeletons-actually-used · machine-readable mirror: /where-are-exoskeletons-actually-used.md