Safety record
Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos) safety record
DEPLOY has no incidents on file for Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos). This rolls up incidents attached directly to Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos), to its models, and to its deployments (operated or manufactured): the same graph as the company page's safety-record summary, shown here with full sourcing and exposure context.
← Back to Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos)
Machine-readable surfaces
- Markdown mirror: /companies/palladyne-ai/safety-record.md
- JSON-LD: embedded in this page’s head
- REST API: /v1/safety/companies/df3e982a-102f-47cf-9d3b-b3be40131d28/profile
- Data documentation: /data
- Query this programmatically: Deploy MCP
Incidents
No incidents on record for Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos). Absence of a recorded incident is not proof of a clean operating history; it reflects what DEPLOY has tracked and verified to date.
Exposure
DEPLOY does not have exposure data (deployment-hours, miles driven, or rides given) on file for Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos). This is a genuine data gap, not a rounding to zero: no incident count above can be turned into a defensible rate without it. NHTSA's SGO dataset itself does not publish exposure denominators, and there is no standardized, regulator-verified nationwide source for AV fleet mileage or ride counts today. Where a company self-publishes a mileage figure, it is not independently audited and is not shown here as DEPLOY-verified data.
Common questions
What is Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos)'s safety record?
Is Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos) safer than a human driver?
Does DEPLOY redact or omit crash details for Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos)?
Full company record: Palladyne AI (formerly Sarcos)