DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium)

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldAMD Instinct MI250XGoogle TPU v6 (Trillium)
Process nodeTSMC N6
TDP560 W200 W
Memory128 GB HBM2e32 GB HBM3
Memory bandwidth3,200 GB/s1,600 GB/s
FP16 (dense)383 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)383 TFLOPS918 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)1,836 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)383 TOPS1,836 TOPS
Form factorOAMOAM (Trillium pod, up to 256 chips)
Announced2021-11-082024-05-14
Released2022-06-012024-12-01

Robots running AMD Instinct MI250X

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Google TPU v6 (Trillium)

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with AMD Instinct MI250X

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Google TPU v6 (Trillium)

Common questions

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which is faster for training?

Google TPU v6 (Trillium) has 4.79x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (AMD Instinct MI250X: 383 TFLOPS; Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 1,836 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which has more memory?

AMD Instinct MI250X carries more HBM (AMD Instinct MI250X: 128 GB HBM2e; Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 32 GB HBM3). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: AMD Instinct MI250X 0.68 (383 ÷ 560 W); Google TPU v6 (Trillium) 9.18 (1,836 ÷ 200 W). Google TPU v6 (Trillium) wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

AMD Instinct MI250X vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which is more widely used?

AMD Instinct MI250X: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 0 robots and 1 data center. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.

See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI250X full page · Google TPU v6 (Trillium) full page.