Chip comparison
AMD Instinct MI250X vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | AMD Instinct MI250X | Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N6 | Samsung 7LPP |
| TDP | 560 W | 90 W |
| Memory | 128 GB HBM2e | 16 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 3,200 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 383 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 383 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 383 TOPS | 300 TOPS |
| Form factor | OAM | Auto-board (dual-SoC) |
| Announced | 2021-11-08 | 2023-01-01 |
| Released | 2022-06-01 | 2023-02-01 |
Robots running AMD Instinct MI250X
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Data centers with AMD Instinct MI250X
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
AMD Instinct MI250X vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which has more memory?
AMD Instinct MI250X carries more HBM (AMD Instinct MI250X: 128 GB HBM2e; Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
AMD Instinct MI250X vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which is more widely used?
AMD Instinct MI250X: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 3 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI250X full page · Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) full page.