DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldAMD Instinct MI350 seriesTesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Process nodeTSMC N3 (chiplet)Samsung 7LPP
TDP1000 W90 W
Memory288 GB HBM3e16 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth8,000 GB/s
FP16 (dense)2,300 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)2,300 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)4,600 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)4,600 TOPS300 TOPS
Form factorOAMAuto-board (dual-SoC)
Announced2025-06-122023-01-01
Released2025-10-012023-02-01

Robots running AMD Instinct MI350 series

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)

Data centers with AMD Instinct MI350 series

Data centers with Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which has more memory?

AMD Instinct MI350 series carries more HBM (AMD Instinct MI350 series: 288 GB HBM3e; Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

AMD Instinct MI350 series vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which is more widely used?

AMD Instinct MI350 series: 0 robots and 1 data center publicly running it. Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 3 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.

See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI350 series full page · Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) full page.