Chip comparison
AWS Inferentia 2 vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium)
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | AWS Inferentia 2 | Google TPU v6 (Trillium) |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N7 | — |
| TDP | 250 W | 200 W |
| Memory | 32 GB HBM3 | 32 GB HBM3 |
| Memory bandwidth | 820 GB/s | 1,600 GB/s |
| BF16 (dense) | 190 TFLOPS | 918 TFLOPS |
| FP8 (dense) | 380 TFLOPS | 1,836 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | — | 1,836 TOPS |
| Form factor | Inf2 EC2 instance | OAM (Trillium pod, up to 256 chips) |
| Announced | 2022-12-01 | 2024-05-14 |
| Released | 2023-04-01 | 2024-12-01 |
Robots running AWS Inferentia 2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Google TPU v6 (Trillium)
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with AWS Inferentia 2
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Google TPU v6 (Trillium)
Common questions
AWS Inferentia 2 vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which is faster for training?
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) has 4.83x the dense FP8 throughput of the other (AWS Inferentia 2: 380 TFLOPS; Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 1,836 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.
AWS Inferentia 2 vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which has more memory?
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) carries more HBM (AWS Inferentia 2: 32 GB HBM3; Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 32 GB HBM3). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
AWS Inferentia 2 vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which is more power-efficient?
Dense FP8 TFLOPS per watt: AWS Inferentia 2 1.52 (380 ÷ 250 W); Google TPU v6 (Trillium) 9.18 (1,836 ÷ 200 W). Google TPU v6 (Trillium) wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.
AWS Inferentia 2 vs Google TPU v6 (Trillium): which is more widely used?
AWS Inferentia 2: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 0 robots and 1 data center. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · AWS Inferentia 2 full page · Google TPU v6 (Trillium) full page.