DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Biren BR100 vs Intel Gaudi 3

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldBiren BR100Intel Gaudi 3
Process nodeTSMC N7TSMC N5
Transistors (B)77
TDP550 W900 W
Memory64 GB HBM2e128 GB HBM2e
Memory bandwidth2,300 GB/s3,675 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,024 TFLOPS1,835 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,024 TFLOPS1,835 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)1,835 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)2,048 TOPS
Form factorOAMOAM
Announced2022-08-092024-04-09
Released2024-09-01

Robots running Biren BR100

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Intel Gaudi 3

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Biren BR100

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Intel Gaudi 3

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Biren BR100 vs Intel Gaudi 3: which is faster for training?

Intel Gaudi 3 has 1.79x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Biren BR100: 1,024 TFLOPS; Intel Gaudi 3: 1,835 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Biren BR100 vs Intel Gaudi 3: which has more memory?

Intel Gaudi 3 carries more HBM (Biren BR100: 64 GB HBM2e; Intel Gaudi 3: 128 GB HBM2e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Biren BR100 vs Intel Gaudi 3: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Biren BR100 1.86 (1,024 ÷ 550 W); Intel Gaudi 3 2.04 (1,835 ÷ 900 W). Intel Gaudi 3 wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Biren BR100 full page · Intel Gaudi 3 full page.