DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Biren BR100 vs SambaNova SN40L

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldBiren BR100SambaNova SN40L
Process nodeTSMC N7TSMC N5
Transistors (B)77
TDP550 W700 W
Memory64 GB HBM2e1500 GB DDR5 (three-tier: 64 MB SRAM + 64 GB HBM3 + 1.5 TB DDR5)
Memory bandwidth2,300 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,024 TFLOPS638 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,024 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)1,250 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)2,048 TOPS
Form factorOAMPCIe (SN40L DataScale system)
Announced2022-08-092023-09-19
Released2024-01-01

Robots running Biren BR100

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running SambaNova SN40L

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Biren BR100

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with SambaNova SN40L

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Biren BR100 vs SambaNova SN40L: which is faster for training?

SambaNova SN40L has 1.22x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Biren BR100: 1,024 TFLOPS; SambaNova SN40L: 1,250 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Biren BR100 vs SambaNova SN40L: which has more memory?

SambaNova SN40L carries more HBM (Biren BR100: 64 GB HBM2e; SambaNova SN40L: 1500 GB DDR5 (three-tier: 64 MB SRAM + 64 GB HBM3 + 1.5 TB DDR5)). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Biren BR100 vs SambaNova SN40L: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Biren BR100 1.86 (1,024 ÷ 550 W); SambaNova SN40L 1.79 (1,250 ÷ 700 W). Biren BR100 wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Biren BR100 full page · SambaNova SN40L full page.