Chip comparison
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) vs Huawei Ascend 910C
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Google TPU v6 (Trillium) | Huawei Ascend 910C |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | — | SMIC N+2 (~7nm) |
| TDP | 200 W | 500 W |
| Memory | 32 GB HBM3 | 128 GB HBM2e |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,600 GB/s | 3,200 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 800 TFLOPS |
| BF16 (dense) | 918 TFLOPS | 800 TFLOPS |
| FP8 (dense) | 1,836 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 1,836 TOPS | 1,600 TOPS |
| Form factor | OAM (Trillium pod, up to 256 chips) | OAM |
| Announced | 2024-05-14 | 2024-09-19 |
| Released | 2024-12-01 | 2025-01-01 |
Robots running Google TPU v6 (Trillium)
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Huawei Ascend 910C
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Google TPU v6 (Trillium)
Data centers with Huawei Ascend 910C
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) vs Huawei Ascend 910C: which is faster for training?
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) has 2.29x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 1,836 TFLOPS; Huawei Ascend 910C: 800 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) vs Huawei Ascend 910C: which has more memory?
Huawei Ascend 910C carries more HBM (Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 32 GB HBM3; Huawei Ascend 910C: 128 GB HBM2e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) vs Huawei Ascend 910C: which is more power-efficient?
Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Google TPU v6 (Trillium) 9.18 (1,836 ÷ 200 W); Huawei Ascend 910C 1.60 (800 ÷ 500 W). Google TPU v6 (Trillium) wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.
Google TPU v6 (Trillium) vs Huawei Ascend 910C: which is more widely used?
Google TPU v6 (Trillium): 0 robots and 1 data center publicly running it. Huawei Ascend 910C: 0 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Google TPU v6 (Trillium) full page · Huawei Ascend 910C full page.