DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Huawei Ascend 910D vs Intel Gaudi 3

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldHuawei Ascend 910DIntel Gaudi 3
Process nodeSMIC N+2 (~7nm)TSMC N5
TDP800 W900 W
Memory192 GB HBM3128 GB HBM2e
Memory bandwidth4,000 GB/s3,675 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,200 TFLOPS1,835 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,200 TFLOPS1,835 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)2,400 TFLOPS1,835 TFLOPS
Form factorOAMOAM
Announced2025-04-012024-04-09
Released2025-12-012024-09-01

Robots running Huawei Ascend 910D

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Intel Gaudi 3

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Huawei Ascend 910D

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Intel Gaudi 3

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Huawei Ascend 910D vs Intel Gaudi 3: which is faster for training?

Huawei Ascend 910D has 1.31x the dense FP8 throughput of the other (Huawei Ascend 910D: 2,400 TFLOPS; Intel Gaudi 3: 1,835 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Huawei Ascend 910D vs Intel Gaudi 3: which has more memory?

Huawei Ascend 910D carries more HBM (Huawei Ascend 910D: 192 GB HBM3; Intel Gaudi 3: 128 GB HBM2e). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Huawei Ascend 910D vs Intel Gaudi 3: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP8 TFLOPS per watt: Huawei Ascend 910D 3.00 (2,400 ÷ 800 W); Intel Gaudi 3 2.04 (1,835 ÷ 900 W). Huawei Ascend 910D wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Huawei Ascend 910D full page · Intel Gaudi 3 full page.