DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Huawei Ascend 910D vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldHuawei Ascend 910DTesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Process nodeSMIC N+2 (~7nm)Samsung 7LPP
TDP800 W90 W
Memory192 GB HBM316 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth4,000 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,200 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,200 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)2,400 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)300 TOPS
Form factorOAMAuto-board (dual-SoC)
Announced2025-04-012023-01-01
Released2025-12-012023-02-01

Robots running Huawei Ascend 910D

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)

Data centers with Huawei Ascend 910D

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Huawei Ascend 910D vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which has more memory?

Huawei Ascend 910D carries more HBM (Huawei Ascend 910D: 192 GB HBM3; Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Huawei Ascend 910D vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which is more widely used?

Huawei Ascend 910D: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 3 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.

See also: every chip comparison · Huawei Ascend 910D full page · Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) full page.