DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldIntel Gaudi 2NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU
Process nodeTSMC N7Samsung 8N
Transistors (B)28.3
Die size628 mm²
TDP600 W150 W
Memory96 GB HBM2e24 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth2,450 GB/s600 GB/s
FP16 (dense)125 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)432 TFLOPS125 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)250 TOPS
Form factorOAMPCIe
Announced2022-05-102021-04-12
Released2022-09-012021-04-12

Robots running Intel Gaudi 2

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Intel Gaudi 2

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU: which is faster for training?

Intel Gaudi 2 has 3.46x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Intel Gaudi 2: 432 TFLOPS; NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU: 125 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU: which has more memory?

Intel Gaudi 2 carries more HBM (Intel Gaudi 2: 96 GB HBM2e; NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU: 24 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Intel Gaudi 2 vs NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Intel Gaudi 2 0.72 (432 ÷ 600 W); NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU 0.83 (125 ÷ 150 W). NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Intel Gaudi 2 full page · NVIDIA A10 Tensor Core GPU full page.