DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Intel Gaudi 3 vs Tenstorrent Blackhole

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldIntel Gaudi 3Tenstorrent Blackhole
Process nodeTSMC N5TSMC N6
TDP900 W300 W
Memory128 GB HBM2e32 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth3,675 GB/s512 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,835 TFLOPS745 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,835 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)1,835 TFLOPS
INT8 (dense)2,980 TOPS
Form factorOAMPCIe
Announced2024-04-092024-07-01
Released2024-09-012025-01-01

Robots running Intel Gaudi 3

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running Tenstorrent Blackhole

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Intel Gaudi 3

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Tenstorrent Blackhole

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Intel Gaudi 3 vs Tenstorrent Blackhole: which is faster for training?

Intel Gaudi 3 has 2.46x the dense FP16/BF16 throughput of the other (Intel Gaudi 3: 1,835 TFLOPS; Tenstorrent Blackhole: 745 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Intel Gaudi 3 vs Tenstorrent Blackhole: which has more memory?

Intel Gaudi 3 carries more HBM (Intel Gaudi 3: 128 GB HBM2e; Tenstorrent Blackhole: 32 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Intel Gaudi 3 vs Tenstorrent Blackhole: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP16/BF16 TFLOPS per watt: Intel Gaudi 3 2.04 (1,835 ÷ 900 W); Tenstorrent Blackhole 2.48 (745 ÷ 300 W). Tenstorrent Blackhole wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Intel Gaudi 3 full page · Tenstorrent Blackhole full page.