Chip comparison
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs SambaNova SN40L
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Mobileye EyeQ6 | SambaNova SN40L |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC 7nm | TSMC N5 |
| TDP | 33 W | 700 W |
| Memory | — | 1500 GB DDR5 (three-tier: 64 MB SRAM + 64 GB HBM3 + 1.5 TB DDR5) |
| FP16 (dense) | — | 638 TFLOPS |
| FP8 (dense) | — | 1,250 TFLOPS |
| INT8 (dense) | 34 TOPS | — |
| Form factor | Auto-safety SoC | PCIe (SN40L DataScale system) |
| Announced | 2022-01-04 | 2023-09-19 |
| Released | 2024-01-01 | 2024-01-01 |
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Robots running SambaNova SN40L
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with SambaNova SN40L
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs SambaNova SN40L: which is more widely used?
Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers publicly running it. SambaNova SN40L: 0 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page · SambaNova SN40L full page.