Chip comparison
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Mobileye EyeQ6 | Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC 7nm | Samsung 7LPP |
| TDP | 33 W | 90 W |
| Memory | — | 16 GB GDDR6 |
| INT8 (dense) | 34 TOPS | 300 TOPS |
| Form factor | Auto-safety SoC | Auto-board (dual-SoC) |
| Announced | 2022-01-04 | 2023-01-01 |
| Released | 2024-01-01 | 2023-02-01 |
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Robots running Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Mobileye EyeQ6 vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which is more widely used?
Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers publicly running it. Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 3 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page · Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) full page.