Chip comparison
Tenstorrent Blackhole vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Tenstorrent Blackhole | Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N6 | Samsung 7LPP |
| TDP | 300 W | 90 W |
| Memory | 32 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 745 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 2,980 TOPS | 300 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe | Auto-board (dual-SoC) |
| Announced | 2024-07-01 | 2023-01-01 |
| Released | 2025-01-01 | 2023-02-01 |
Robots running Tenstorrent Blackhole
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Data centers with Tenstorrent Blackhole
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Tenstorrent Blackhole vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which has more memory?
Tenstorrent Blackhole carries more HBM (Tenstorrent Blackhole: 32 GB GDDR6; Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Tenstorrent Blackhole vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which is more widely used?
Tenstorrent Blackhole: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 3 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Tenstorrent Blackhole full page · Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) full page.