Chip comparison
Tenstorrent Wormhole vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Tenstorrent Wormhole | Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | GlobalFoundries 12nm | Samsung 7LPP |
| TDP | 160 W | 90 W |
| Memory | 12 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | — |
| FP16 (dense) | 148 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 590 TOPS | 300 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe (n300, n150) | Auto-board (dual-SoC) |
| Announced | 2024-07-01 | 2023-01-01 |
| Released | 2024-08-01 | 2023-02-01 |
Robots running Tenstorrent Wormhole
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
Data centers with Tenstorrent Wormhole
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2)
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Tenstorrent Wormhole vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which has more memory?
Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) carries more HBM (Tenstorrent Wormhole: 12 GB GDDR6; Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 16 GB GDDR6). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
Tenstorrent Wormhole vs Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): which is more widely used?
Tenstorrent Wormhole: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2): 3 robots and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Tenstorrent Wormhole full page · Tesla HW4 (FSD Computer 2) full page.