Data center comparison
AirTrunk OSK1 vs AirTrunk SYD3
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| AirTrunk OSK1 | AirTrunk SYD3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | under construction | under construction |
| Developer | AirTrunk | AirTrunk |
| Location | Osaka, Japan (Kansai International Airport) | Sydney, Australia |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, AirTrunk OSK1 or AirTrunk SYD3?
AirTrunk OSK1 is under construction; AirTrunk SYD3 is under construction. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are AirTrunk OSK1 and AirTrunk SYD3?
AirTrunk OSK1 is in Osaka, Japan (Kansai International Airport); AirTrunk SYD3 is in Sydney, Australia. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.