Data center comparison
Aligned Conesville Industrial Park Campus vs PORTS-Pike Technology Campus
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Aligned Conesville Industrial Park Campus | PORTS-Pike Technology Campus | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | 10 GW |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | 0 GW |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | 10 GW |
| Lifecycle | under construction | announced |
| Developer | Aligned Data Centers | SB Energy |
| Location | Conesville, Coshocton County, Ohio, United States | Piketon, Ohio, United States |
| Grid | PJM | PJM |
| Acreage | 197 acres | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Aligned Conesville Industrial Park Campus or PORTS-Pike Technology Campus?
Aligned Conesville Industrial Park Campus is under construction; PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is announced. Energized capacity: not recorded versus 0 GW. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Aligned Conesville Industrial Park Campus and PORTS-Pike Technology Campus?
Aligned Conesville Industrial Park Campus is in Conesville, Coshocton County, Ohio, United States; PORTS-Pike Technology Campus is in Piketon, Ohio, United States. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.