Data center comparison
Microsoft Fairwater Data Center vs Microsoft Woodward Data Center Campus
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Microsoft Fairwater Data Center | Microsoft Woodward Data Center Campus | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | 0.45 GW | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | 0.37 GW | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | 0.08 GW | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | partially energized | announced |
| Developer | Microsoft / OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Location | Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, United States | Woodward, Iowa |
| Grid | MISO | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | 616 acres |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Microsoft Fairwater Data Center or Microsoft Woodward Data Center Campus?
Microsoft Fairwater Data Center is partially energized; Microsoft Woodward Data Center Campus is announced. Energized capacity: 0.37 GW versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Microsoft Fairwater Data Center and Microsoft Woodward Data Center Campus?
Microsoft Fairwater Data Center is in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, United States; Microsoft Woodward Data Center Campus is in Woodward, Iowa. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.