Data center comparison
Israel cluster vs Kansas City
Announced-vs-energized capacity, lifecycle, developer, and location for two AI data center campuses, side by side and individually sourced.
Side by side
| Israel cluster | Kansas City | |
|---|---|---|
| Announced capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Energized capacity | not recorded | not recorded |
| Announced-to-energized gap | not recorded | not recorded |
| Lifecycle | energized | energized |
| Developer | Nebius | Nebius |
| Location | Tel Aviv, Israel (IDF operations) | Kansas City, Kansas, USA |
| Grid | not recorded | not recorded |
| Acreage | not recorded | not recorded |
On the map
Common questions
Which is further along, Israel cluster or Kansas City?
Israel cluster is energized; Kansas City is energized. Energized capacity: not recorded versus not recorded. DEPLOY tracks the announced-to-energized gap, so "further along" means more energized, not more announced.
Where are Israel cluster and Kansas City?
Israel cluster is in Tel Aviv, Israel (IDF operations); Kansas City is in Kansas City, Kansas, USA. Each record on DEPLOY is sourced and dated.
Compare more on the data center index or the national map. Announced numbers are claims, not built capacity; see the methodology.