Chip comparison
AMD Instinct MI300X vs Meta MTIA v2
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | AMD Instinct MI300X | Meta MTIA v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 + N6 (chiplet) | TSMC N5 |
| Transistors (B) | 153 | — |
| TDP | 750 W | 90 W |
| Memory | 192 GB HBM3 | 128 GB LPDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 5,300 GB/s | 205 GB/s |
| FP16 (dense) | 1,307 TFLOPS | — |
| BF16 (dense) | 1,307 TFLOPS | — |
| FP8 (dense) | 2,614 TFLOPS | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 2,614 TOPS | 708 TOPS |
| Launch price (list) | $15,000 | — |
| Form factor | OAM | PCIe (internal Meta) |
| Announced | 2023-12-06 | 2024-04-10 |
| Released | 2024-01-01 | 2024-05-01 |
Robots running AMD Instinct MI300X
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Meta MTIA v2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Data centers with AMD Instinct MI300X
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Data centers with Meta MTIA v2
Common questions
AMD Instinct MI300X vs Meta MTIA v2: which has more memory?
AMD Instinct MI300X carries more HBM (AMD Instinct MI300X: 192 GB HBM3; Meta MTIA v2: 128 GB LPDDR5). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.
AMD Instinct MI300X vs Meta MTIA v2: which is more widely used?
AMD Instinct MI300X: 0 robots and 0 data centers publicly running it. Meta MTIA v2: 0 robots and 2 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · AMD Instinct MI300X full page · Meta MTIA v2 full page.