DEPLOYDatabase

Chip comparison

Intel Gaudi 3 vs SambaNova SN40L

Side-by-side specs

Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.

FieldIntel Gaudi 3SambaNova SN40L
Process nodeTSMC N5TSMC N5
TDP900 W700 W
Memory128 GB HBM2e1500 GB DDR5 (three-tier: 64 MB SRAM + 64 GB HBM3 + 1.5 TB DDR5)
Memory bandwidth3,675 GB/s
FP16 (dense)1,835 TFLOPS638 TFLOPS
BF16 (dense)1,835 TFLOPS
FP8 (dense)1,835 TFLOPS1,250 TFLOPS
Form factorOAMPCIe (SN40L DataScale system)
Announced2024-04-092023-09-19
Released2024-09-012024-01-01

Robots running Intel Gaudi 3

No robots publicly running it yet.

Robots running SambaNova SN40L

No robots publicly running it yet.

Data centers with Intel Gaudi 3

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Data centers with SambaNova SN40L

No data centers publicly running it yet.

Common questions

Intel Gaudi 3 vs SambaNova SN40L: which is faster for training?

Intel Gaudi 3 has 1.47x the dense FP8 throughput of the other (Intel Gaudi 3: 1,835 TFLOPS; SambaNova SN40L: 1,250 TFLOPS). Real-world training speed also depends on memory bandwidth, interconnect, and software stack: see the spec diff for those inputs.

Intel Gaudi 3 vs SambaNova SN40L: which has more memory?

SambaNova SN40L carries more HBM (Intel Gaudi 3: 128 GB HBM2e; SambaNova SN40L: 1500 GB DDR5 (three-tier: 64 MB SRAM + 64 GB HBM3 + 1.5 TB DDR5)). Memory capacity sets the largest model that fits on one chip without partitioning; memory bandwidth sets inference throughput.

Intel Gaudi 3 vs SambaNova SN40L: which is more power-efficient?

Dense FP8 TFLOPS per watt: Intel Gaudi 3 2.04 (1,835 ÷ 900 W); SambaNova SN40L 1.79 (1,250 ÷ 700 W). Intel Gaudi 3 wins at the die level; system-level efficiency also depends on cooling and interconnect.

See also: every chip comparison · Intel Gaudi 3 full page · SambaNova SN40L full page.