Chip comparison
Meta MTIA v2 vs Mobileye EyeQ6
Side-by-side specs
Straight from each vendor's datasheet. Winner in bold: higher throughput, memory, or transistor count; lower power draw or price. Sparse (2:4) throughput roughly doubles the FP8/INT8 numbers shown.
| Field | Meta MTIA v2 | Mobileye EyeQ6 |
|---|---|---|
| Process node | TSMC N5 | TSMC 7nm |
| TDP | 90 W | 33 W |
| Memory | 128 GB LPDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth | 205 GB/s | — |
| INT8 (dense) | 708 TOPS | 34 TOPS |
| Form factor | PCIe (internal Meta) | Auto-safety SoC |
| Announced | 2024-04-10 | 2022-01-04 |
| Released | 2024-05-01 | 2024-01-01 |
Robots running Meta MTIA v2
No robots publicly running it yet.
Robots running Mobileye EyeQ6
Data centers with Meta MTIA v2
Data centers with Mobileye EyeQ6
No data centers publicly running it yet.
Common questions
Meta MTIA v2 vs Mobileye EyeQ6: which is more widely used?
Meta MTIA v2: 0 robots and 2 data centers publicly running it. Mobileye EyeQ6: 1 robot and 0 data centers. Empty here means no operator has said publicly, not zero adoption in the market.
See also: every chip comparison · Meta MTIA v2 full page · Mobileye EyeQ6 full page.